By Jean-Louis Auget; et al
Read or Download Advances in statistical methods for the health sciences : applications to cancer and AIDS studies, genome sequence analysis, and survival analysis PDF
Best education & training books
Greater than simply Board assessment for USMLE, Steps 2 & three, Blueprints surgical procedure, third version can help in the course of clerkship rotations and subinternship. the hot variation has been up-to-date with the aid of citizens to keep up a student-to-student technique. beneficial properties contain: Concise, exact, medical high-yield content material masking all you must understand for the USMLE and rotations USMLE kind questions with complete reasons supplied within the solutions Key issues in each part highlighting crucial, high-yield details for every subject Color-enhanced layout to extend the usefulness of figures and tables
The Institute of medication research Crossing the standard Chasm (2001) instructed that an interdisciplinary summit be held to additional reform of overall healthiness professions schooling as a way to improve caliber and sufferer safeguard. "Health Professions schooling: A Bridge to caliber" is the keep on with as much as that summit, held in June 2002, the place one hundred fifty members throughout disciplines and occupations built rules approximately the way to combine a center set of abilities into well-being professions schooling.
New! tips on how to use your place machine to enhance research behavior and make the simplest use of analysis time.
- The Clinical Lacan (The Lacanian Clinical Field) (Lacanian Clincial Field)
- Quality Assurance in Medical Education: A Practical Guide
- Time to Heal: American Medical Education from the Turn of the Century to the Era of Managed Care
- Die therapeutische Beziehung
Extra info for Advances in statistical methods for the health sciences : applications to cancer and AIDS studies, genome sequence analysis, and survival analysis
Clark, G. M. for the Statistics Subcommittee of the NCI/EORTC Working Group on Cancer Diagnostics (2005). Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK), Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 97, 1180–1184. 15. Oxman, A. , Clarke, M. , and Stewart, L. A. (1995). From science to practice. Meta-analyses using individual patient data are needed, Journal of the American Medical Association, 274, 845–846. 16. Parmar, M. , and Stewart, L. (1998). Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints, Statistics in Medicine, 17, 2815–2834.
In time, we may hope that reporting guidelines for primary prognostic studies may lead to better quality published information; see McShane, Altman, and Sauerbrei (2005). Individual patient data undoubtedly provide the best quality of information for any systematic review. The great disadvantage is that it is tremendously Systematic Review of Multiple Studies of Prognosis 15 time-consuming – the whole process can take several years. Also, we note that it cannot overcome either deﬁciencies of individual studies or heterogeneity of methodological approaches, although such issues will become much clearer in an IPD systematic review.
Altman et al. References 1. Altman, D. G. (2001). Systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables, British Medical Journal, 323, 224–228. 2. Altman, D. , and Schumacher, M. (1994). Dangers of using “optimal” cutpoints in the evaluation of prognostic factors, Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 86, 829–835. 3. Altman, D. , and Lyman, G. H. (1998). Methodological challenges in the evaluation of prognostic factors in breast cancer, Breast Cancer Research Treatment, 52, 289–303. 4. , and Friedenreich, C.