By McWhorter, John; Good, Jeff
Read Online or Download A Grammar of Saramaccan Creole PDF
Best grammar books
Systematic research of the discourse-functions of clefts and pseudo-clefts, supplying info at the frequency of those structures in several genres, and combating the `tidying-up' present in examples devised by way of the linguist.
This monograph examines complicated phrases -- compounds and people related to derivational and inflectional affixation -- from a syntactic viewpoint that encompasses either the constitution of phrases and the approach of principles for producing that constitution. the writer contends that the syntax of phrases and the extra generic syntax concerning relatives between phrases needs to be outlined by means of discrete units of ideas within the grammar, yet however that note constitution has an analogous basic formal homes because the higher syntactic constitution and is generated via a similar type of rule process.
This quantity units out to supply a complete description of the grammar of Gooniyandi, a non-Pama-Nyungan language of the southern-central Kimberley quarter of Western Australia. It covers phonetics and phonology, notice word and clause constitution, and the semantics of closed-class grammatical goods.
- Yes, I Could Care Less: How to Be a Language Snob Without Being a Jerk
- Explorations in Semantics and Pragmatics
- Key Features and Parameters in Arabic Grammar (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today)
- Handbook of Formal Languages: Volume 1 Word, Language, Grammar
- Metaphors for Learning: Cross-cultural Perspectives (Human Cognitive Processing)
Additional info for A Grammar of Saramaccan Creole
Da̗ ˾ ‘rapids’; hási ‘horse’ vs. ha̗ ˾ si ‘ant’ u/Ǌ háfu ‘half’ vs. ah‘ ܞgrass’; núsu ‘nose’ vs. njܞsu ‘news’ o/õ jajó ‘loose living’ vs. aj۲ ‘onion’; kóto ‘skirt’ vs. k۲tu ‘legend’ э/э˾ násэ ‘or’ vs. nasƭ̗э˾ ‘nation’; mэ̗sэ ‘mix’ vs. mэ̗ ˾ э˾sэ ‘never’ Examples of minimal or near minimal pairs/sets across short and long vowels for each of the vowel qualities are given in Table 6. 3. ) Generally (and perhaps exclusively), these extra long sequences are the result of a relatively recent sound change wherein intervocalic alveolars were deleted (see the section on l for further discussion).
Máta ‘mortar,’ mbulu ‘receding hairline’ vs. múlu ‘uterus,’ and namá ‘touch’ vs. nambá ‘strap’; and hэ̗ndi ‘hunt’ vs. hэ̗ni ‘bee,’ pína ‘pin’ vs. pindá ‘peanut,’ and kándúu ‘amulet type’ vs. ’ However, there are still some potentially noteworthy gaps in attested contrasts – for example, the lack of an n/nd distinction before a word-initially given that there are many words beginning with na in the language (in contrast to nu, for example, which is much less common to begin with, rendering the lack of n/nd distinction word-initially before u less striking).
E. ܡƾ#). While we have not examined this phenomenon extensively, we did encounter this as a possibility for a word Rountree cites, sͅғ ‘shame,’ for example, as well as with the word agba̗ ˾ ‘pot type,’ when informally examined with one consultant. Thus, a nasalized vowel followed by a velar nasal appears to be a possible allophonic variant of vowel nasalization, at least word-finally in careful speech. Examples of words containing each of the seven vowel qualities nasalized are given in Table 3.